So chiropractic is at a philosophic crossroads. Since the conception of the profession, it has been at this same philosophic crossroads; it's really rather remarkable that we have maintained as much of the core value as we have. D.D. Palmer came up with chiropractic, and B.J. Palmer had the vision to make it grow. And from day one there has been interprofessional strife about what chiropractic really is.
Some practitioners view chiropractic as more of a holistic branch of medicine; we try to fix problems from a natural standpoint, and focus on preventional methodology. Others prefer a more physical therapy approach, or, more specifically, treating musculoskeletal disorders with the adjustment as the therapy. Still others (and saddest of all) think that chiropractic school was easier to get through than medical school, so they scraped through and have "Dr." in front of their name, with no clear reason for doing it, other than prestige. I personally know people from every one of the perspectives I just described.
Sherman College's reputation has been founded on the subluxation-based philosophy of chiropractic, as the founders saw it. All things in the body are governed and healed by the body, and locating, analyzing, and correcting vertebral subluxations free the way for the nervous system to communicate clearly, thus facilitating the optimal function of the body. I found Sherman College online, and was intrigued by the word "Straight" in the name, thinking, at first, that it had to do with straightening the spine. As I learned more about the legal struggles of the school, and the unique philosophical grounding, I decided to come here. I learned that "straight" related to "pure philosophy" in the chiropractic realm.
Then, I discovered that within the "straight" crowd is even more fractioning. Some believe that adjusting anything by hand equals straight, be it spine or elbow or skull. Others believe that only adjusting the first bone in the vertebral column is the way to be straight. Usually, as I understand it, the argument has at least upheld that adjustments are important, whether they be administered by a "straight" or a "mixer," that is, one who mixes adjustments with other forms of treatment, usually physical therapy-related.
Over the past several years, though, the discussion has changed. Pharmacology will be added into the curriculum. Probably this will happen gradually, and not while I'm in school, for which I'm grateful. Osteopathy was once a separate and distinct profession of healing, involving manipulation of the joints for the purpose of improving circulation. Now, however, the profession is swallowed by medicine, and now the Doctor of Osteopathy is largely a medical doctor, who prescribes pharmaceuticals, and who also has the basic training to manipulate joints, if they so desire. To what purpose?
I once spoke at my undergraduate college, to discuss my continuing education in the field of chiropractic, and why the profession (and Sherman College) was unique. I spoke of philosophy, and one of the students said to me, "Oh, then I know I don't want to go to that school, because I hate philosophy." What?
You have a philosophy. You may know it, or you may prefer to think you make decisions based on the need of the moment, but there is an underlying drive to your life. Self-enforced ignorance will only get you so far. I encourage you to figure out your drive, before you find yourself at a dead-end one day, thinking "How did I get here?" As for my chosen profession...I don't know where it will end up. The other side of the argument believes that they are right, just as I believe I am right.
I can say I know my philosophy, and I know what drives me. I don't want to practice pharmacology; I want to detect and adjust subluxations. I don't want to electrically stimulate, administer ultrasound, or massage. Honestly, I don't care what the chiropractor down the road is doing in his or her office, as long as they are not hurting people. I guess I picked up the battle flag when I decided to become a chiropractor, but I'd really rather be just taking care of people, by adjusting their spines.

Recent Comments